A Constitutionally Momentous Judgment That Changes Practically Nothing? - The UK Supreme Court’s Decision on the Prorogation of Parliament Wilkinson, Michael Author aut Text xx# 2019 Verfassungsblog 2019-09-25 eng
electronic resource
remote
Computermedien
Online-Ressource
 The Supreme Court’s judgment in Cherry/Miller (No 2) that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful, null and of no effect was a bold move as a matter of public law. It represents a constitutional court willing to assert its authority as guardian of the constitution. But although potentially of long-term constitutional moment, it changes very little with regard to the fundamental constitutional and political issue of Britain’s membership of the European Union. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Wilkinson, Michael prorogation separation of powers UK Supreme Court 342 https://verfassungsblog.de/a-constitutionally-momentous-judgment-that-changes-practically-nothing/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.17176/20190925-232622-0 190925 10.17176/20190925-232622-0 Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)