<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/f1b4cef420acc94d</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/a-human-right-to-climate-protection-as-life-saving-treatment/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>A Human Right to Climate Protection as “Life-Saving Treatment”? - Risks and Side Effects of the Climate Jurisdiction as Defended by Manuela Niehaus</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Wegener, Bernhard</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2024-05-03</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Climate Justice</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>KlimaSeniorinnen</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Klimaschutz</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Klimaschutz</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>climate litigation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Klimaschutz</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Manuela Niehaus defends the human rights-based climate jurisprudence - especially of the ECtHR - against my criticism. It is not "Homeophatic Globules for Environmental Lawyers", but a potentially life-saving medicine that - in combination with other means - can make a significant contribution to climate protection.</dc:description>
</dc>
