nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20210303-153929-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 210303s2021||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20210303-153929-0 doi eng 342 23 Prabhat, Devyani Author aut A Paean to Judicial (Self) Restraint - The UK Supreme Court Shamima Begum Decision Prabhat, Devyani Verfassungsblog 2021-03-03 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The UK Supreme Court Shamima Begum decision is widely reported to be a win for former home secretary Sajid Javid who had stripped Begum of her citizenship. Yet, is it really a vindication of this action? The decision of the Supreme Court is not based on a factual assessment of Begum’s case but only on whether she has to be given permission to return to the UK to participate in an effective and fair manner in the immigration appeal. A limited decision, and by no means a final adjudication on Begum’s deprivation of citizenship case. CC BY-SA 4.0 Judicial restraint Judicial Review Shamima Begum UK Supreme Court Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/a-paean-to-judicial-self-restraint/ raw object