<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/8873b1a55d5e4205</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/a-queerer-european-society/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>A Queer(er) European Society? - Commission v Hungary from a Queer Materialist Perspective</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Tomaselli, Davide</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-06-30</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Article 2 TEU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU values</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>European Society</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>LGBTQI</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Pluralism</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>queer rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The CJEU’s judgment in Commission v Hungary undeniably marked a monumental advancement of EU law. While acknowledging the magnitude of the case seems unproblematic, identifying its impact and its beneficiaries is a less straightforward task. In this contribution,  I raise questions from a critical queer perspective while centering on the concept of a value-based European society. I argue that the Court’s underdeveloped elaboration on the politics of values eschews material structures of oppression and exploitation and thus risks foreclosing actual transformative legal interventions.</dc:description>
</dc>
