nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/6316e22d0f570c6d DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240415s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/6316e22d0f570c6d doi eng 342 23 Chamon, Merijn Author aut A Rejoinder to Citizenship for Sale (Commission v Malta) - Some Remarks and Counterarguments Chamon, Merijn Verfassungsblog 2024-04-15 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In his piece on Citizenship for Sale of 14 April 2024, Joseph Weiler criticizes the European Commission's infringement procedure against Malta's golden passport scheme. He names three reasons why the Commission should (or could) not have brought the case and the Court should not uphold it. While the present reply does not argue that the Court will necessarily find in the Commission's favour, the Commission's legal claim and strategy do not seem to be as (constitutionally) problematic as Weiler make them out to be. CC BY-SA 4.0 Citizenship EU EU Malta Malta (DE-588)10290611-7 gnd EU (DE-588)4037257-1 gnd Malta Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/a-rejoinder-to-citizenship-for-sale/ raw object