<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20200218-043735-0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/a-restrictionist-revolution/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>A Restrictionist Revolution? - A Counter-Intuitive Reading of the ECtHR’s N.D. &amp; N.T.-Judgment on ‘Hot Expulsions’ at the Spanish-Moroccan Border</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Thym, Daniel</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2020-02-17</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Collective Expulsion</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Non Refoulement</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Refugee Protection</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The immediate response to the ECtHR’s N.D. &amp; N.T.-Judgment on ‘Hot Expulsions’ at the Spanish-Moroccan Border was shock and dismay – but the decision can also be read differently: as defined by a series of inbuilt ambiguities that combine restrictionist tendencies with dynamic elements, which are bound to cause heated debates of both principle and practice in the coming years.</dc:description>
</dc>
