nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/4e2d436d29f227d3 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240527s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/4e2d436d29f227d3 doi eng 342 23 Rocha, Armando Author aut A Small But Important Step - A Bird’s-Eye View of the ITLOS Advisory Opinion on Climate Change and International Law Rocha, Armando Verfassungsblog 2024-05-27 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier While no advisory opinion can solve the climate crisis, the ITLOS decision does provide an important push for action, both globally and at the national level. It cleared the way for the ICJ’s forthcoming opinion on climate change, demonstrating how a clear and solid line of arguments can be developed. Although the ICJ may decide differently due to variations in the questions posed and treaties interpreted, it is unlikely to diverge significantly from the ITLOS narrative or reject its findings on related topics. CC BY-SA 4.0 Climate Crisis Due Dilligence ITLOS International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea | Hamburg UNCLOS climate change climate litigation (DE-588)5326618-3 gnd International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea | Hamburg Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/a-small-but-important-step/ raw object