nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/3de89ab4faaa9181 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240527s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/3de89ab4faaa9181 doi eng 342 23 Zimmermann, Anton Author aut Access to Supply Chain Justice? - Some procedural spotlights on Art. 29 para. 3 CSDDD Zimmermann, Anton Verfassungsblog 2024-05-27 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier One of the novel features of the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive is a private law liability for damages caused upstream in the supply chain. However, liability under substantive law is worthless without procedural rules that allow for its enforcement. Within the context of supply chain liability there are at least two major procedural problems. First, victims affected by supply chain mishandlings might be unable to afford proceedings in Europe. Second, proving that a company has not exercised a sufficient level of diligence can be difficult. Art. 29 para. 3 CSDDD seeks to address those issues. CC BY-SA 4.0 CSSSD Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive EU EU (DE-588)10290611-7 gnd EU Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/access-to-supply-chain-justice/ raw object