nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20220728-181720-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 220728s2022||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20220728-181720-0 doi eng 342 23 Kuczerawy, Aleksandra Author aut (orcid)0000-0001-7660-5493 Accessing Information about Abortion - The Role of Online Platforms Under the EU Digital Services Act Kuczerawy, Aleksandra Verfassungsblog 2022-07-28 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The U.S. Supreme Court decision of 24 June 2022 overruled a half century of precedent supporting a constitutional right to abortion across the U.S. established in 1973 in Roe v. Wade. Essentially, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization left the decision on abortion to individual states. The ruling, although astonishing, was not necessarily a surprise, after its draft had leaked a few weeks earlier. But to the surprise of many, almost immediately, Facebook and Instagram started removing posts informing about access to abortion pills, the Associated Press and Vice first reported. CC BY-SA 4.0 Abortion Dobbs DSA Freedom of Expression Platform Regulation Dutkiewicz, Lidia Author aut (orcid)0000-0002-1297-7156 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/accessing-information-about-abortion/ raw object