nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20190912-232652-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 190912s2019||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20190912-232652-0 doi eng 342 23 Hathaway, James C. Author aut Acquiescing in Refoulement Hathaway, James C. Verfassungsblog 2019-09-12 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The judgment of the US Supreme Court issued on Wednesday (Attorney General v. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant) purports to be simply procedural: It overturns a lower court injunction that prevented President Trump’s unilateral “safe third country” rule from coming into force before its legality is tested on the merits. But in truth, the Supreme Court knowingly acquiesced in the refoulement of refugees arriving at the US southern border. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 asylum Non Refoulement US Supreme Court Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/acquiescing-in-refoulement/ raw object