nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/a1fd0186da3a718b DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 241016s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/a1fd0186da3a718b doi eng 342 23 Täuber, Niklas Author aut Admissibility Revisited - EU climate litigation between Plaumann, Aarhus, and KlimaSeniorinnen Täuber, Niklas Verfassungsblog 2024-10-16 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In an effort to force the European Union to adopt more ambitious climate targets, two environmental NGOs initiated a proceeding before the EU General Court, invoking the rarely used mechanism of “internal review” under the EU’s Aarhus Regulation. The reason for this unusual approach lies within a reoccurring issue of climate litigation: overcoming restrictive admissibility requirements. This new approach follows a path that had not yet been considered by legal scholarship or practice. While the line of argument is rather innovative, it goes beyond the boundaries of the Aarhus Regulation and is therefore likely to fail. CC BY-SA 4.0 Aarhus Convention Aarhus-Verordnung | Europäische Union KlimaSeniorinnen climate litigation (DE-588)1214600743 gnd Aarhus-Verordnung | Europäische Union Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/admissibility-revisited/ raw object