nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20230214-113046-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 230214s2023||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20230214-113046-0 doi eng 342 23 Deb, Anurag Author aut (orcid)0000-0001-6226-3760 Allister and Peeples - The UK Supreme Court looks at BREXIT (again) Deb, Anurag Verfassungsblog 2023-02-14 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The ruling in Allister and Peeples of 8 February 2023 serves as a potent reminder that the UK has yet to fully say goodbye to Brexit. The matter being scrutinised was the Northern Ireland Protocol and questions surrounding its constitutionality within the famously uncodified UK constitution. Critically, the UK Supreme Court appears to have poured cold water on the idea that certain Acts of the UK Parliament have a constitutional character (the constitutional statutes doctrine). It is my suggestion, however, that the doctrine has not entirely been consigned to history. CC BY-SA 4.0 Allister and Peeples brexit Ireland Ireland/Northern Ireland Protocol NIP Northern Ireland UK Supreme Court United Kingdom Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/allister-and-peeples/ raw object