<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/2f7e652ef296cbd0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/americas-right-to-kidnap/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>America’s Right to Kidnap - What Alvarez-Machain Tells Us About Legal Dualism at the Border of Sovereignty</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Moreno, Carlos</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-09-07</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Alvarez-Machain but United States v. Noriega</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Immunity</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Jurisdiction</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Ker v. Illinois</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Nicolás Maduro</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>USA</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>extradiction</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>USA</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>On September 3, 2026, lawyers for Nicolás Maduro filed a motion asking a federal judge in Manhattan to dismiss the narco-terrorism indictment against him, arguing that a sitting head of state enjoys absolute immunity from the criminal jurisdiction of any court but his own. Yet the doctrinal groundwork for treating a foreign leader’s forcible removal as jurisdictionally unproblematic had already been laid, more than three decades earlier, in a case about a Mexican physician most people have never heard of.</dc:description>
</dc>
