nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/9e3bc16d4c624b28 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 241017s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/9e3bc16d4c624b28 doi eng 342 23 Kattan, Victor Author aut Apartheid or Systemic Discrimination? - A Connotative Reading of the ICJ’s Advisory Opinion Kattan, Victor Verfassungsblog 2024-10-17 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This contribution argues that, reading between the lines, the expression “systemic discrimination”, which the Court referred to in para. 223 of the Advisory Opinion, was used as a synonym for “apartheid”, even though the Court did not link this description to a breach of Article 3 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, but there does not appear to be any substantial difference between apartheid and systemic discrimination. This is because the word systemic is associated with crimes against humanity which is how apartheid is defined as a crime in international law. CC BY-SA 4.0 apartheid Apartheit Convention ICJ Israel-Hamas-Krieg Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/apartheid-or-systemic-discrimination/ raw object