nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/991bc2285a8fa9d4 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240330s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/991bc2285a8fa9d4 doi eng 342 23 de Almeida Ribeiro, Gonçalo Author aut (orcid)0000-0001-9304-1650 As Good as It Gets - Party Bans and Democratic Militancy de Almeida Ribeiro, Gonçalo Verfassungsblog 2024-03-30 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Contrasting the constitutional limitations on the freedom to establish political parties in Italy and Germany brings out two quite different conceptions of militant democracy: one is particularistic, retrospective, and provisional – preoccupied with the transition to democracy; the other is universalistic, prospective, and enduring – concerned with the degeneration of democracy. The Portuguese Constitution, true to its eclectic character and multiple influences, steers a seemingly middle course between these polar options. CC BY-SA 4.0 Comparative Constitutionalism Faschismus Fascism Militant Democracy Parteiverbot Parteiverbot Party Ban (DE-588)4016494-9 gnd Faschismus (DE-588)4173414-2 gnd Parteiverbot Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/as-good-as-it-gets/ raw object