<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20230131-174523-0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/battling-the-hydra/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Battling the hydra in EU anti-discrimination law - ECJ judgment raises more questions about discrimination against self-employed workers</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Křičková, Lenka</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Fellerová Palkovská, Iva</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2023-01-31</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>anti-discrimination</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Discrimination</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>ECJ</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>employment law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>European Court of Justice</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Homophobia</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>J.K. v. TP</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Poland</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>public broadcaster</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Can a company refuse to conclude or renew a contract with a self-employed person because he is gay? And may contractual freedom prevail over the prohibition of discrimination in such a situation? A short answer stemming from the recent ECJ judgment in J.K. v. TP would be a resounding no. Yet, a further analysis is in order because the judgment also brings a significant shift in the ECJ’s anti-discrimination case law.</dc:description>
</dc>
