nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/03ec3a8df4949a1d DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240514s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/03ec3a8df4949a1d doi eng 342 23 Storf, Pia Lotta Author aut Bend it like Britain? Storf, Pia Lotta Verfassungsblog 2024-05-14 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier After months of parliamentary ping-pong, the UK Parliament passed the “Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Act” in late April. Not even two weeks later, 66 persons were detained to be deported to Rwanda, and the FDA launched an unprecedented legal action before the High Court, claiming the Act conflicts with the Civil Service Code obligation to “uphold the rule of law and administration of justice.” By seeking to avoid the prohibition of refoulement, the Act undermines both core principles of the rule of law and disapplies fundamental human rights protections. This blog post discusses key provisions of the new Act, the concerns they raise and some remaining avenues for legal challenges. CC BY-SA 4.0 Judicial Review migrant rights Non Refoulement Rule of Law Rwanda Safety of Rwanda Act United Kingdom Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/bend-it-like-britain/ raw object