nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/c79c902ee1b18569 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240402s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/c79c902ee1b18569 doi eng 342 23 Berthout, Augustin Author aut Between Legal Deficiencies and Political Restraint - The Prohibition of Political Parties in France Berthout, Augustin Verfassungsblog 2024-04-02 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Traditionally, it is Germany, not France, which is presented as the model example of militant democracy. Among the various provisions of the German Basic Law, Article 21 (2), setting out the procedure for banning political parties, is perhaps one of the clearest expressions of the basic constitutional decision in favour of a streitbare Demokratie. Nevertheless, setting concepts aside and examining empirical data, it is interesting to note that Germany has banned fewer political parties than France since the end of the Second World War. CC BY-SA 4.0 Comparative Constitutionalism Conseil Constitutionnel Conseil d'Etat Militant Democracy Parteiverbot Parteiverbot Party Ban Wehrhafte Demokratie (DE-588)4173414-2 gnd Parteiverbot Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/between-legal-deficiencies-and-political-restraint/ raw object