<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/5332921c063a796f</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/breaking-non-retroactivity/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Breaking Non-Retroactivity - The Romanian Constitutional Court Erased a Constitutional Principle</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Selejan-Gutan, Bianca</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-09-14</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Constitutional Court</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Rumänien</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>non-retroactivity</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>romania</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Rumänien</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Is a politically appointed court still a court? The old dilemma of kelsenian constitutional courts could not be more topical in the case of the Romanian Constitutional Court, which recently issued a decision that shattered a constitutional principle underlying every democratic system: the principle of non-retroactivity. The political influence is probable in this case; such an infringement of an ancient principle of law by a court at this level cannot be otherwise explained. Constitutional justice was not blind but was driven by political interest and used as a tool of political vendetta.</dc:description>
</dc>
