nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20161107-103833 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 161106s2016||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20161107-103833 doi eng 342 23 Tomkins, Adam Author aut Brexit, Democracy and the Rule of Law Tomkins, Adam Verfassungsblog 2016-11-06 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The decision of the High Court in London this week was a ruling not on whether Brexit should happen, but on how it can happen lawfully. There is nothing at all in the court’s judgment to block the will of the people, to reverse the result of the referendum, or to get in the way of Brexit. Nor is there anything inappropriate in turning to the courts to determine how Brexit can proceed in accordance with the rule of law. That said, as a lawyer I think the court’s ruling is wrong. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 brexit High Court Parliamentary Sovereignty Royal Prerogative Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/brexit-democracy-and-the-rule-of-law/ raw object