nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20181209-202049-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 181207s2018||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20181209-202049-0 doi eng 342 23 Hardan, Odey Author aut Can an Art. 50 TEU withdrawal notice be revoked? How Advocate General Bordona offered a legal Trojan horse to Union law Hardan, Odey Verfassungsblog 2018-12-07 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In his opinion given in the Case Wightman et. al., Advocate General Bordona pleads for the possibility to revoke the notification of withdrawal. Although it may be politically and economically desirable to keep the UK in the Union, this does not justify the introduction of a “legal Trojan horse” into the European law order by interpreting the European treaties in a one-sided manner. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Art. 50 TEU brexit Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/can-an-art-50-teu-withdrawal-notice-be-revoked-how-advocate-general-bordona-offered-a-legal-trojan-horse-to-union-law/ raw object