<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/4282694c79ba502f</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/case-c-19-23-minimum-wage/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Case C‑19/23 on the Minimum Wage Directive - EU Competences and the CJEU’s Refusal to Restrain the Legislature on Pay</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Quadros, Inês</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-01-24</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Case C‑19/23</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Minimum wage</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Pay</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>competences</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The Decision on the validity of the “Minimum Wage Directive” from November 2025 was analysed from several aspects, but in the present commentary, I focus on the Court’s interpretation of the limit set by Article 153(5) TFEU to the Union’s legislative competence. The latter excludes the adoption of measures relating to […] “pay”. Arguably, the Court’s reasoning shrinks the contours of the exclusion of “pay”, thereby limiting the practical reach of Article 153(5) TFEU in a way that invites consideration of whether the retained national competences are taken seriously.</dc:description>
</dc>
