<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20220802-181613-0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/challenging-censorship/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Challenging Censorship - Why Twitter is challenging India’s opaque online censorship procedures</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Singh, Tanmay</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Dasarathi, Amala</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2022-08-02</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Censorship</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Deplatforming</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Freedom of Speech</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Platform Governance</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Twitter</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>India’s online censorship laws have, since they were framed, been entirely lacking in transparency, and have consequently shielded the Indian government from any and all form of accountability. A writ petition by Twitter in an Indian High Court hopes to change that. Depending on which way the Courts rule, the fundamental rights of free expression, of due process and of access to the internet of millions of Indians are going to be decided by the end of this case.</dc:description>
</dc>
