CILFIT in Strasbourg Krommendijk, Jasper Author aut (orcid)0000-0002-3371-7580 Text xx# 2024 Verfassungsblog 2024-03-14 eng
electronic resource
remote
Computermedien
Online-Ressource
 On 19 February 2024, the European Court of Human Rights decided not to answer the Estonian Supreme Court’s request for an advisory opinion on the basis of Protocol 16 (P16). For the first time, it dismissed a request because it did not concern a question of principle concerning the interpretation and application of ECHR rights. The decision is significant because the ECtHR provides clear contours as to what types of questions courts should (not) ask. CC BY-SA 4.0 Krommendijk, Jasper ECHR ECtHR Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg admissibility Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg 342 https://verfassungsblog.de/cilfit-in-strasbourg/ Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH 10.59704/6bef0271e6de70c8 240314 10.59704/6bef0271e6de70c8 Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl (Revision 1.140 20200717)