nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/ad4e5cfbff844d33 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 251223s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/ad4e5cfbff844d33 doi eng 342 23 FitzGerald, Michael Author aut Judicial De-Simplification - Interpreting Russmedia, the GDPR, and Intermediary Liability in the European Union FitzGerald, Michael Verfassungsblog 2025-12-23 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In early December, the Court of Justice handed down a controversial ruling in Russmedia – indicating that online platforms can no longer confidently rely on EU intermediary liability law for protection against legal responsibility for user content in cases which involve data protection violations. Russmedia significantly weakens the intermediary liability protection – but the extent of the damage to the safe harbour remains unclear. The judgment can be read as having either a broad or narrow application, and the extent of the damage will depend upon how expansively the case is interpreted. And already, different actors are reading the judgment in very different ways. CC BY-SA 4.0 CJEU Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt) Platform Regulation digital platforms gdpr notice and take down (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt) Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/cjeu-russmedia/ raw object