<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.7" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-7.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Judicial De-Simplification - Interpreting Russmedia, the GDPR, and Intermediary Liability in the European Union</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal" usage="primary">
    <namePart>FitzGerald, Michael</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Author</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource/>
  <genre authority="rdacontent">Text</genre>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xx#</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">2025</dateIssued>
  </originInfo>
  <originInfo eventType="publisher">
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text"/>
    </place>
    <publisher>Verfassungsblog</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2025-12-23</dateIssued>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marccategory">electronic resource</form>
    <form authority="marcsmd">remote</form>
    <form type="media" authority="rdamedia">Computermedien</form>
    <form type="carrier" authority="rdacarrier">Online-Ressource</form>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract displayLabel="Summary">In early December, the Court of Justice handed down a controversial ruling in Russmedia – indicating that online platforms can no longer confidently rely on EU intermediary liability law for protection against legal responsibility for user content in cases which involve data protection violations. Russmedia significantly weakens the intermediary liability protection – but the extent of the damage to the safe harbour remains unclear. The judgment can be read as having either a broad or narrow application, and the extent of the damage will depend upon how expansively the case is interpreted. And already, different actors are reading the judgment in very different ways.</abstract>
  <accessCondition type="use and reproduction">CC BY-SA 4.0</accessCondition>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">FitzGerald, Michael</note>
  <subject>
    <topic>CJEU</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt)</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Platform Regulation</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>digital platforms</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>gdpr</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>notice and take down</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" authority="gnd" xlink:href="(DE-588)5103273-9">
    <topic>Europäischer Gerichtshof | Luxemburg (Stadt)</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="ddc" edition="23">342</classification>
  <location>
    <url displayLabel="raw object" usage="primary display">https://verfassungsblog.de/cjeu-russmedia/</url>
  </location>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Verfassungsblog</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <identifier type="issn">2366-7044</identifier>
    <name>
      <namePart>Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH</namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <identifier type="doi">10.59704/ad4e5cfbff844d33</identifier>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">251223</recordCreationDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="DE-Verfassungsblog">10.59704/ad4e5cfbff844d33</recordIdentifier>
    <recordOrigin>Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.7 using MARC21slim2MODS3-7.xsl
				(Revision 1.140 20200717)</recordOrigin>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
