<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/c00395538d0cd838</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/climate-change-in-the-high-court-of-australia/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Climate Change in the High Court of Australia - Will a Coal Mine’s Contribution to Climate Change Cause Likely Environmental Impacts ‘In the Locality’?</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Scott, Nick</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Narulla, Harj</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Young, Nicholas</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Burger, Michael</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>van Asselt, Harro</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Wentz, Jessica</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Tigre, Maria Antonia</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-05-11</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>In May, the High Court of Australia (HCA) will hear MACH Energy Australia v Denman Aberdeen Muswellbrook Scone Healthy Environment Group &amp; Anor (“Denman”), the first climate case to reach Australia’s apex court. The case adds to a growing body of climate jurisprudence in which courts consider whether and how climate impacts must be integrated into environmental impact assessments. However, the Denman case raises a further question: whether the GHG emissions associated with a coal mine can be understood as being likely to cause climate and environmental impacts in a particular “locality”.</dc:description>
</dc>
