nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20220321-121240-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 220321s2022||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20220321-121240-0 doi eng 342 23 Bönnemann, Maxim Author aut (orcid)0000-0002-0095-3747 Comparative Climate Litigation in North-South Perspective - Editorial Bönnemann, Maxim Verfassungsblog 2022-03-21 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier If the catastrophe we face is one “for the world and humanity”, isn’t it time to rethink some of our core beliefs regarding institutional roles and the role of the judiciary? If current institutional arrangements fail when addressing the global climate catastrophe, aren’t we in dire need of alternative approaches when thinking about the role of law and courts? We as editors of the forthcoming blog debate neither can nor want to provide answers to these questions here. Instead, we argue that we should look to the Global South for lessons when reflecting on the role of law and institutions in tackling the climate crisis. CC BY-SA 4.0 Climate Crisis climate litigation Global South Krakau, Meike Author aut Saiger, Anna-Julia Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/comparative-climate-litigation-in-north-south-perspective/ raw object