nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/6c2038bfac46d391 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240525s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/6c2038bfac46d391 doi eng 342 23 McIntyre, Juliette Author aut Consensus, at what Cost? McIntyre, Juliette Verfassungsblog 2024-05-25 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier After four applications for provisional measures, three sets of formal orders and two rounds of oral hearings, on Friday night, the International Court of Justice in South Africa v. Israel delivered a long-awaited Order. It is, to be frank, most unsatisfactory. While the Court is known for its “Solomonic” decisions, which try to give each party a little of what they asked for at times to no one’s satisfaction, this is not a maritime boundary delimitation where equidistance can be imposed in pursuit of impartiality. CC BY-SA 4.0 ICJ Israel-Gaza War Israel-Hamas War Provisional Measures Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/consensus-at-what-cost/ raw object