<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20230406-190248-0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/constitutional-change-in-the-uk-people-or-party/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Constitutional Change in the UK – People or Party?</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Young, Alison</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2023-04-06</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>brexit</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Constitutional Change</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU Membership</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Referendum</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Retained EU Law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>UK Constitutionalism</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>United Kingdom</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The UK’s membership of, and later exit from, the EU has had a dramatic effect on the UK constitution. It also provided a catalyst for further change. These demonstrate the relative ease with which the UK constitution can be modified, reinforcing the UK’s characterisation as a predominantly political, flexible constitution. This post will argue that these transformations illustrate something more fundamental that applies to all constitutions – be they predominantly codified or uncodified, with or without the ability of the courts to strike down unconstitutional legislation.</dc:description>
</dc>
