<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/55184a96adabe0b0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/constitutional-identity-vs-human-rights/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Constitutional Identity vs. Human Rights - The ECtHR's Bizarre Turn in Three Latvian Cases</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Ganty, Sarah</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Kochenov, Dimitry Vladimirovich</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Nugraha, Ignatius Yordan</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2023-12-21</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Constitutional Identity</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>European Court of Human Rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Minority Protection</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>minority rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Proportionality</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>In two recent Latvian cases concerning the Russian-speaking minority decided respectively in September and November 2023, the ECtHR made clear that protection of constitutional identity has now been elevated to a legitimate aim for a differential treatment under the Convention. This post explores how the protection of constitutional identity has been deployed to enable a collective punishment by association with a former occupier, and how the ECtHR’s reasoning has effectively endorsed such a punishment, which is unbefitting of a liberal democratic system the ECHR aspires to represent. Until the three cases were decided, no liberal European democracy could argue without losing face that suppressing a large proportion of its population was its constitutional identity – one of the goals of its statehood. Today, this claim is seemingly kosher, marking a U-turn in the understanding of what the European human rights protection system is for minorities in Europe.</dc:description>
</dc>
