nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20231002-233617-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 231002s2023||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20231002-233617-0 doi eng 342 23 Bakshi, Kushagr Author aut Constitutional Pluralism and Article 370 Bakshi, Kushagr Verfassungsblog 2023-10-02 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Recently, the Indian Supreme Court finished hearing oral arguments on a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of The Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 2019 which extended all provisions of the Indian Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir. In the midst of the arguments, the Court pondered upon the nature of the relationship between the Constitution of India and the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir. While the Court is unlikely to hand down an authoritative ruling on this relationship, the exchanges between the judges and lawyers offer us a valuable avenue to explore. By analysing the Jammu and Kashmir Constituent Assembly Debates, this piece examines the nature of the relationship envisaged by the two constitutions. I argue that the constitutional principle that undergirded the previously existing constitutional relationship between India and Jammu and Kashmir is heterarchy. CC BY-SA 4.0 Art. 370 Constitutional Pluralism Kashmir Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/constitutional-pluralism-and-article-370/ raw object