nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/f13cc4b80b759f76 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 260820s2026||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/f13cc4b80b759f76 doi eng 342 23 Drinóczi, Tímea Author aut Constitutional Politics in Action – Part II - The Constitutional Court Rejects the Challenges to the 16th and 17th Constitutional Amendments Drinóczi, Tímea Verfassungsblog 2026-08-20 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In August 2026, the Hungarian Constitutional Court rejected the petitions challenging the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Amendments to the Fundamental Law. The petitions concerned the dismantling of the public-interest asset management foundations performing public duty, the termination of the mandate of the President of the Republic, the introduction of an age limit affecting sitting CC judges, and limits on eligibility for parliamentary office. In each case, the Court held that the petition in substance sought a prohibited substantive review of a constitutional amendment. CC BY-SA 4.0 Constitutional Court Constitutional Review Fidesz Ungarn constitutional amendment (DE-588)4078541-5 gnd Ungarn Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/constitutional-politics-in-action-part-ii/ raw object