<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/976104ec4519b20f</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/copyright-teaching-cdsm/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Unlocking Potential - Why and How We Should Revise Copyright Exceptions for Educational Purposes in the EU</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>de la Durantaye, Katharina</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-11-13</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>CDSM Directive</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Copyright</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Educational policy</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>European Union</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>InfoSoc Directive</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Copyright</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>EU copyright law’s teaching exceptions do not deserve a perfect grade. The law unduly privileges classical teaching practices by traditional educational institutions over more informal ways of teaching, it grants too much power to publishers, and it allows for differences in transposition, which hinder cross-border teaching projects and negatively impact the common market. Each of these elements should change.</dc:description>
</dc>
