<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/1c7d0817f644eee8</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/cornell-and-criminalization/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Cornell and Criminalization - Why New York Should Not Rush to Broaden Its Sex-Crime Law</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Gruber, Aya</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-10-23</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Cornell</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Cornell 7</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Criminal Law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Sex-Crime Law</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>US</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The Cornell Seven case has become a rallying cry for tougher sex-crime laws, but outrage can be a dangerous lawmaker. The debate exposes a profound legal dilemma where the entirely natural fluidity of consent mid-encounter clashes with the rigid boundaries of criminal law. In the rush to close legal loopholes, the line between protecting sexual autonomy and undermining it risks getting lost.</dc:description>
</dc>
