nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/39741a30234e4d48 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 240125s2024||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/39741a30234e4d48 doi eng 342 23 Mann, Itamar Author aut Counter-Genocidal Governance - A social-legal perspective on litigating the crime of crimes Mann, Itamar Verfassungsblog 2024-01-25 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The International Court of Justice’s decision regarding South Africa’s request for provisional measures in its genocide case against Israel is expected tomorrow. Whatever the Court decides, it is worthwhile noting that the impact of the process is already evident. And any provisional measures that may be given, will shape a years-long and likely tense dialog between Israel and the Court, as well as third countries. Everything that will happen for the duration of the proceedings, over the next two or three years at least, will continue to build evidence until, finally, the owl of Minerva will spread its wings. My purpose in this post is to provide some provisional reflections on how that may work. In doing so, I will expand a bit on a notion I’ve tried to develop in a previous post, that of counter-genocidal governance. CC BY-SA 4.0 Genocide ICJ Israel-Gaza War Israel-Hamas War Völkermord (DE-588)4063690-2 gnd Völkermord Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/counter-genocidal-governance/ raw object