<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/dac32d7304bc9af8</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/counter-terrorism-law-and-free-speech-on-campus/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Counter-Terrorism Law and Free Speech on Campus - Discrimination Law as an Additional Safeguard?</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Attenborough, Frederick</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-11-04</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Campus</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Counter-Terrorism</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Free Speech</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Prevent</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>UK</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>radicalisation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>UK</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>A rare Equality Act 2010 challenge to a referral under Prevent, the UK’s counter-terrorism programme for identifying and responding to suspected signs of radicalisation, has ended with a County Court finding that a school unlawfully discriminated against a Muslim schoolboy. Although a first-instance decision, the ruling has important implications for universities. The case foregrounds a risk inherent in Prevent’s precautionary referral process that the lawful expression of staff and students may be recast as evidence of radicalisation through a linguistic gloss unsupported by the underlying facts.</dc:description>
</dc>
