nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/dac32d7304bc9af8 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 261104s2026||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/dac32d7304bc9af8 doi eng 342 23 Attenborough, Frederick Author aut Counter-Terrorism Law and Free Speech on Campus - Discrimination Law as an Additional Safeguard? Attenborough, Frederick Verfassungsblog 2026-11-04 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier A rare Equality Act 2010 challenge to a referral under Prevent, the UK’s counter-terrorism programme for identifying and responding to suspected signs of radicalisation, has ended with a County Court finding that a school unlawfully discriminated against a Muslim schoolboy. Although a first-instance decision, the ruling has important implications for universities. The case foregrounds a risk inherent in Prevent’s precautionary referral process that the lawful expression of staff and students may be recast as evidence of radicalisation through a linguistic gloss unsupported by the underlying facts. CC BY-SA 4.0 Campus Counter-Terrorism Free Speech Prevent UK radicalisation (DE-588)10290328-1 gnd UK Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/counter-terrorism-law-and-free-speech-on-campus/ raw object