<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/010ef9ba39e34865</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/culture-and-law-commission-v-hungary/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Culture and Law in European Society after Commission v Hungary</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Villanueva, Aurélie</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-07-01</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Article 2 TEU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Article 21 EU Charter</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>European Society</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>culture</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The judgment of the CJEU in Case C-769/22 Commission v Hungary is not only about cultural services and their regulation but features several arguments regarding both Hungarian Christian culture and the culture of gender and sexually diverse individuals – what could be called LGBTQI+ culture in general.
I reflect on three cultural implications emerging from the case: the societal implication of cultural content, the role of EU law in accommodating national preferences and the limitations of EU law in interacting with cultural practices.</dc:description>
</dc>
