nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/c6d08f1e6716d2fb DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 251024s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/c6d08f1e6716d2fb doi eng 342 23 Eklund, Hanna Author aut Ethnically Stratified Citizenship  - What the Advocate General Sidestepped, and the Court Should Note before Deciding the Danish Ghetto Area Case Eklund, Hanna Verfassungsblog 2025-10-24 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The upcoming ECJ judgment in Slagelse Almennyttige Boligselskab – the so-called Danish Ghetto Area case – could reshape the boundaries of EU equality law. At issue is whether Denmark’s policy targeting neighborhoods with more than 50% “non-western immigrants and their descendants” amounts to discrimination based on race or ethnic origin. While Advocate General Ćapeta framed the case around ethnic discrimination, the deeper question is one of EU citizenship: can EU law accept stratification of EU citizenship along ethnic lines? CC BY-SA 4.0 Citizenship Denmark Discrimination Ethnic Discrimination EU citizenship European Court of Justice Racial Discrimination Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/danish-ghetto-area-case/ raw object