nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20251203-172053-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 251103s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20251203-172053-0 doi eng 342 23 Petel, Matthias Author aut Cooperation Without Justice? - On the Elusive Differentiation of Responsibilities in the ICJ’s Climate Advisory Opinion Petel, Matthias Verfassungsblog 2025-11-03 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The ICJ’s advisory opinion insists heavily on the duty to cooperate to protect the climate system. I show that this duty of cooperation is grounded in an acknowledgment of differentiated obligations among states but falls short in specifying how those differentiated obligations should be quantified, whether in relation to mitigation or to adaptation finance. I argue this reflects a general reluctance to engage with the distributive issues central to climate justice claims which, in turn, serves to preserve the ICJ legitimacy.  CC BY-SA 4.0 Advisory Opinion Climate Crisis ICJ Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/differentiation-of-responsibilities-in-the-icjs-climate-advisory-opinion/ raw object