nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20200419-182125-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 200419s2020||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20200419-182125-0 doi eng 342 23 Bárd, Petra Author aut Domestic Courts Pushing for a Workable Test to Protect the Rule of Law in the EU - Decoding the Amsterdam and Karlsruhe Courts’ post-LM Rulings (Part II) Bárd, Petra Verfassungsblog 2020-04-19 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier On 17 February 2020, the Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe passed a decision in a surrender case that we expect to shape the future of the LM-test. Its decision can be seen not only as a result of Luxembourg’s unworkable LM test but also as an acknowledgement of the effect of Poland’s muzzle law on the independence of its judiciary. Shortly after, Rechtbank Amsterdam engaged with this decision, thus making it more likely that the CJEU will have to move forward and develop its test into a more meaningful one. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 European Arrest Warrant judicial dialogue Poland Rule of Law Morijn, John Author aut Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/domestic-courts-pushing-for-a-workable-test-to-protect-the-rule-of-law-in-the-eu/ raw object