<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20220513-182117-0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/drifting-case-law-on-judicial-independence/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Drifting Case-law on Judicial Independence - A Double Standard as to What Is a ‘Court’ Under EU Law? (CJEU Ruling in C-132/20 Getin Noble Bank)</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Filipek, Paweł</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2022-05-13</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>CJEU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Court</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Judicial appointment</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>judicial independence</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Rule of Law</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>In a preliminary ruling of 29 March 2022, in case C-132/20 Getin Noble Bank, the CJEU answered questions on judicial independence of judges appointed under an undemocratic regime and of judges appointed before 2018 in an allegedly flawed process. Taking a highly formalistic approach, the Court seeks to preserve judicial dialogue between itself and the national judges – at the expense of the rule of law and judicial independence.</dc:description>
</dc>
