<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/65fbb920301d7a90</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/ecjs-eus-climate-mitigation-obligations-mercosur/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>The ECJ’s Opportunity to Address the EU’s Climate Mitigation Obligations - On the Possible Request for an Opinion on the EU-Mercosur Deal</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Eckes, Christina</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-09-18</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>climate change</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Climate Crisis</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Court of Justice of the European Union</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU Climate Target</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>International Court of Justice</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Mercosur</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>The pending EU-Mercosur Trade Agreement raises fundamental questions regarding the Union’s climate mitigation obligations under both EU and international law. Members of the European Parliament are considering a request for an opinion from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the agreement’s compatibility with EU law. Such a review is warranted, as the agreement appears incompatible with the EU’s mitigation duties.</dc:description>
</dc>
