nam 22 uu 4500 10.17176/20220406-131305-0 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 220406s2022||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.17176/20220406-131305-0 doi eng 342 23 Schmalz, Dana Author aut Enlarging the Hole in the Fence of Migrants’ Rights - A.A. and others v. North Macedonia Schmalz, Dana Verfassungsblog 2022-04-06 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier With the judgment in A.A. and others v. North Macedonia, the European Court of Human Rights further branches out the creative exception to the prohibition of collective expulsions and turns it into an obligation to offer a place to apply for asylum somewhere at the border. But not only are these legal access points for asylum applications often de facto restricted, the ever more creative exceptions to rights of the Convention and its Protocols threatens the credibility and authority of the Court. CC BY-SA 4.0 asylum Collective Expulsion European Court on Human Rights Non Refoulement Refugee Protection Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/enlarging-the-hole-in-the-fence-of-migrants-rights/ raw object