<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/c9e2ef52e68cdf2c</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/envisioning-a-gender-equal-european-society/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Envisioning a Gender-Equal European Society</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Steininger, Silvia</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Kim, Seona</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-06-30</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Article 2 TEU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Commission v Hungary</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>European Society</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Gender Legal Studies</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>gender equality</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Among the manifold analyses of Commission v Hungary and a flourishing debate on the realization of a European society based on values, the question of gender has been largely overlooked. We argue that the understanding of a European society which aims to uphold the values of Art. 2 TEU has to be anti-patriarchal. In the following contribution, we apply a feminist methodology – feminist re-writing/re-reading –  to the Court’s arguments to carve out hypothetical future orientations for creating a non-patriarchal European society.</dc:description>
</dc>
