<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/667e53c9d0e1b42b</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/escaping-jurisdictional-blackholes/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>Escaping Jurisdictional Blackholes - Why National Courts Should Step Up in the Area of EU Common Foreign and Security Policy and Actively Protect Fundamental Rights</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Spaventa, Eleanor</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2023-12-15</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>CFSP</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU ECHR accession</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>European Charter of Fundamental Rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>fundamental rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>There is a lack of effective judicial protection in the field of EU Common Foreign and Security Policy. In a recent opinion, AG Ćapeta has suggested that the solution rests with asserting the possibility of establishing the non-contractual liability of the EU for breach of fundamental rights in CFSP cases, regardless of whether the measure imposes restrictions. However, the Council also has a positive duty stemming from the Charter to include a jurisdictional clause in all CFSP measures indicating the national court which has jurisdiction in those cases.</dc:description>
</dc>
