<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/a6f7e58093f98aa5</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/eu-belarus-border-migrant-instrumentalisation/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>From the EU-Belarus Border to Strasbourg - The Cases on ‘Migrant Instrumentalisation’ Before the ECtHR</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Ancite-Jepifánova, Aleksandra</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2025-03-03</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Belarus</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>ECtHR</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>European Union</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Migrant Instrumentalisation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Migration</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>On 12 February 2025 the ECtHR considered for the first time the interpretation of the Convention in the context of so-called ‘migrant instrumentalisation’ or ‘hybrid attacks’, allegedly orchestrated by the Belarusian regime after the EU imposed sanctions on Minsk. This contribution critically reviews the key arguments of the respondent governments with respect to the interpretation of Art. 3 ECHR and Art. 4 Prot. 4 ECHR and considers the relationship between the two in the particular context.</dc:description>
</dc>
