nam 22 uu 4500 10.59704/a6f7e58093f98aa5 DE-Verfassungsblog cr||||| 250303s2025||||xx#|||||o|||| ||| 0|eng|| 10.59704/a6f7e58093f98aa5 doi eng 342 23 Ancite-Jepifánova, Aleksandra Author aut (orcid)0000-0001-9501-2845 From the EU-Belarus Border to Strasbourg - The Cases on ‘Migrant Instrumentalisation’ Before the ECtHR Ancite-Jepifánova, Aleksandra Verfassungsblog 2025-03-03 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier On 12 February 2025 the ECtHR considered for the first time the interpretation of the Convention in the context of so-called ‘migrant instrumentalisation’ or ‘hybrid attacks’, allegedly orchestrated by the Belarusian regime after the EU imposed sanctions on Minsk. This contribution critically reviews the key arguments of the respondent governments with respect to the interpretation of Art. 3 ECHR and Art. 4 Prot. 4 ECHR and considers the relationship between the two in the particular context. CC BY-SA 4.0 Belarus ECtHR EU European Union Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg Migrant Instrumentalisation Migration (DE-588)10290611-7 gnd EU (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte | Straßburg Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH Verfassungsblog 2366-7044 https://verfassungsblog.de/eu-belarus-border-migrant-instrumentalisation/ raw object