<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/simpledc20021212.xsd">
  <dc:identifier>http://dx.doi.org/10.59704/f2d9b1a706ac1d2e</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://verfassungsblog.de/european-society-between-facts-and-norms/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:title>European Society Between Facts and Norms</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Feisel, Franca Maria</dc:creator>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:date>2026-06-26</dc:date>
  <dc:type>electronic resource</dc:type>
  <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
  <dc:subject>ddc:342</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Article 2 TEU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Commission v Hungary</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Court of Justice of the European Union</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>European Union</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Jürgen Habermas</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>LGBTQ+ rights</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Pluralism</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>EU</dc:subject>
  <dc:publisher>Verfassungsblog</dc:publisher>
  <dc:relation>Verfassungsblog--2366-7044</dc:relation>
  <dc:rights>CC BY-SA 4.0</dc:rights>
  <dc:description>Article 2 TEU values, such as pluralism, oscillate between descriptive claims, legal normativity, and appeals to European society as a source of authority. From a Habermasian perspective, the democratic legitimacy of EU values enforcement remains difficult to justify in the absence of a robust pan-European deliberative process through which those values can be articulated and contested. At the same time, Commission v Hungary constitutes a legitimate restorative intervention in a dysfunctional democratic process distorted by the stigmatisation of LGBTQ+ persons.</dc:description>
</dc>
